Month: January 2026

ECtHR: Poland found to have violated the European Convention on Human Rights in the case of judge Łukasz Biliński

Judge Łukasz Biliński has won his case against Poland before the European Court of Human Rights. The judgment was delivered following an application lodged with the Court in November 2019. The Judge was represented before the Strasbourg Court by advocates from the Pietrzak Sidor & Wspólnicy Law Firm: Małgorzata Mączka-Pacholak and Mikołaj Pietrzak.

– This is a precedent-setting judgment. For the first time, the ECtHR examined a complaint brought by a Polish judge whose official duties were changed against his will. The Court clearly emphasised that in such cases it is essential to protect judges against arbitrariness in decision-making and to ensure access to an appropriate appeal procedure before an impartial body – comments adv. Małgorzata Mączka-Pacholak.

Until 2019, Judge Biliński adjudicated at the District Court for Warsaw-Śródmieście in Warsaw, handling numerous misdemeanour cases, including those concerning freedom of assembly. Some of his rulings were perceived as unfavourable to the government, and he was publicly criticised by politicians from the ruling party. Without seeking the opinion of the collegiate body of the Regional Court, the President of the court transferred Judge Biliński to the 3rd Family and Juvenile Division. His appeal against that decision to the National Council of the Judiciary was dismissed.

In its judgment of 15 January, a Chamber composed of seven judges found that Poland had violated Article 6 § 1 (the right of access to a court) of the European Convention on Human Rights. The Court held that the decision to transfer the applicant had not been subject to review by a body exercising judicial functions or by an ordinary court. Furthermore, in order to safeguard judicial independence, the guarantees applicable to compulsory transfers of judges between different courts must also apply to compulsory transfers between divisions of the same court dealing with different areas of law. By way of just satisfaction for non-pecuniary damage, Poland was ordered to pay the applicant EUR 20,000, as well as EUR 6,000 in respect of costs and expenses.

Karol Staśkiewicz for “Rzeczpospolita”: the registration of a family foundation should not be treated as a mere technical formality

Registering a family foundation in Poland is no longer a novelty, yet it can still be surprising in practice. The key risk lies not in the substantive assessment of the application, but in the rigorous approach to formal requirements adopted by the registry court. An article by our expert, legal advicer Karol Staśkiewicz, published in “Rzeczpospolita”, demonstrates that it is precisely the registration stage that requires founders to exercise particular diligence and to be familiar with the current practice of the registry court.

– Returns of registration applications due to formal deficiencies are a major challenge for founders. For this reason, the registration of a family foundation should not be treated merely as a technical formality. It is advisable to prepare a complete set of documents well in advance, in particular to ensure that up-to-date criminal record certificates are attached, that statements of consent from members of the foundation’s governing bodies are submitted in original form or as notarised copies, and that the application clearly indicates whether the founding capital is covered by marital community property, together with a spousal consent where applicable – explains legal advisor Karol Staśkiewicz.

The scale of these challenges is illustrated by the data underlying the article. The analysis was based on a review of registration case files held by the Regional Court in Piotrków Trybunalski. The collected data show, among other things, that:

  • only 10 applications for the registration of a family foundation were dismissed;

  • as many as 138 applications were returned due to formal deficiencies;

  • founders must be prepared to meet a broad range of formal requirements when submitting registration applications if they wish to avoid requests to remedy deficiencies and the resulting prolongation of the registration procedure.

We encourage you to read the full article. It constitutes a practical contribution to the discussion on effective succession planning and asset protection in family-owned businesses. More [PL]: Pułapki rejestracji fundacji rodzinnej – rp.pl

The article is the result of cooperation with the Family Business Law Centre of the Faculty of Law and Administration at the University of Warsaw.

Authors: legal advisor Karol Staśkiewicz of Pietrzak Sidor & Wspólnicy Law Firm, in cooperation with Dr Małgorzata Rejmer of LEX Financial Law Firm. Special thanks to Bartosz Kuc for his support in reviewing court files and collecting the data.

Scroll to top
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.